Wednesday, 8 July 2015

Anglican Church Decline in the West – The Data


The Anglican Church, once a key institution in the English-speaking world, has suffered decline for over half a century. Although in both the UK and North America there are many examples of growing and lively Anglican churches, as national denominations the trend is downwards. This decline is in marked contrast to continued Anglican growth in Africa and other parts of the world. There the church is healthy. In the West it is sick. The question is – is the Anglican sickness unto death?

In this blog I explore the different patterns of Anglican decline through four denominations: the Church of England (C of E), the Church in Wales (C in W), the Scottish Episcopal Church (SEC), and the Episcopal Church of the USA (ECUSA). The study is not perfect, nor is the data, but I hope it inspires debate and other studies. A subsequent blog will suggest possible reasons for their differences in decline.

1. The Pattern of Decline

Which of the four denominations is the healthiest, and which has the worst decline?

First look at the attendance data since the beginning of the century. Such a short period is used as churches tend to change their method of measuring attendance over time, which will skew any predictions. A shorter time frame will help reduce this effect.  The attendance data is graphed in figure 1 [1][2].

Figure 1: Attendance of C of E, ECUSA – left scale; C in W – right scale.

It is clear the Church of England is the largest of the 3 denominations; indeed it is larger than ECUSA (left scale) even though the USA is over six times the size of England.  Numerically ECUSA has never had the position in the USA that the Church of England has had in England. Nevertheless it could still command influence on US society, perhaps because it inherited the C of E’s prestige.  By contrast the C in W is much smaller (right scale), reflecting its place in a much smaller country.

Bigger differences emerge when the rate of decline is examined. One measure of decline is the slope of the line through the data points. Here the C of E has the slowest decline, ECUSA has the fastest, and the C in W somewhere in the middle. Clearly the Church of England is healthier that the other two.

When looked at as percentages, ECUSA had a 2.7% per annum decline in 2010, whereas the C in W had 2.9%. So why is ECUSA declining faster? Simply because it is much larger; 2.7% of a big number is a big number! Percentages are misleading as the above declines are not exponential but largely linear, as aging is part of the process. As such the percentage decline of all will increase in time.  In 2010 the C of E had an annual decline of 1.1%, which means it is losing less in absolute terms than ECUSA. Thus ECUSA is the worst declining of the three.

2. Extinction

How likely is it that these denominations will become extinct if current trends continue?

Attendance and membership data for all four denominations are fitted to the limited enthusiasm model of church growth, a model that is able to use data and decide whether a declining church is heading for extinction or not [2] [3].

The Church in Wales, Scottish Episcopal Church and the Episcopal Church of the USA are all firmly under the extinction threshold. By this I mean that for the range of model parameters that calibrate to the data then all resulting simulations indicate future extinction. By contrast the Church of England is on the margins of extinction, some calibrations say yes, just; some say no, just [4]. Again there is a clear distinction between the C of E and the others.

The limited enthusiasm model was not set up to predict when extinction may take place [5], only that it will. To estimate an extinction date linear extrapolation is used on the basis of the recent attendance and membership data, as they are approximately straight, noted previously. The results are displayed in table 1, with the graph of the attendance results in figure 2 (membership used for the SEC [2].)


Expected Extinction Date
Church of England
ECUSA
Church in Wales
Scottish Episcopal Church
Attendance
2100
2041
2039
-
Membership
2082
2055
2043
2043

Table 1: Predicted Extinction Dates Using Linear Regression and extrapolation (note *).

Figure 2: Projected Attendance for C of E, ECUSA – left scale; C in W, SEC – right scale.

ECUSA, C in W and SEC attendance figures all predict extinction dates around 2040 [6] figure 2. This date is confirmed for the latter two by the projected membership data, with the ECUSA membership predicting an extra 15 years, table 1. Membership data for Anglican churches tends to be unreliable as it relies on electoral roles that are only maintained periodically, and have fairly minimal criteria for inclusion. Thus I would go with the figures predicted by attendance.

By contrast the Church of England’s extinction is at the end of the century, so far away that it effectively says it is not clear if its decline results in extinction or not. Again there is a clear difference between the C of E and the other three denominations.

There is a certain amount of “wiggle” room in all these results, but not enough to delay the extinction of the denominations by much. If current trends continue, the Episcopal churches of the USA, Scotland and Wales are near the end of their lifespans, and will be seeing massive church closures from around 2025 onwards.

3. Long Term Patterns

Where does this church decline sit in the broad scheme of the churches’ histories?

There are no reliable attendance figures going back into the 20th century. Instead membership figures are used, taken as a percentage of the population of each country. This will allow for population growth. The results are compared, on the same scale, in figure 3, from 1900.

Figure 3: Membership as percentage of population for C of E, ECUSA, C in W, and SEC.

In the past both the Church of England and the Church in Wales have had a greater share of their national populations than that of either SEC or ECUSA. This could reflect the fact that they were the “conformist” traditions in their lands, unlike Scottish Episcopalians, who were non-conformists among Presbyterians, and ECUSA who were merely one of many denominations. It may also reflect considerable over-reporting of electoral roles by the established churches earlier in the century. The steeper decline in the C of E from 1970 probably represents a better definition of membership coming into use! It has stabilised in this century.

By 2000 the C of E and C in W have similar membership percentages, despite differing attendance percentages, 2.4% compared with 1.6% respectively. It is likely the C in W, with almost double the number of “members” compared with attenders, has much over-reporting on its electoral roles.

Conclusion

Thus, generally speaking, the Church of England commands more loyalty among society than ECUSA, Scottish Episcopal Church or the Church in Wales. Its decline is slower, and it is unlikely to face extinction this century, unlike the other three, which have 25-35 years remaining.  Given the likely acceleration of church closures that will start in the next decade, these three Anglican denominations probably have less than 10 years to address the issue of their impending extinction.

I should also note that none of the four denominations has ever commanded widespread public loyalty in terms of membership or attendance. Churches in the West have never been as popular as they have perceived themselves to be. The church might find the future easier to face by keeping in mind its mission, and its Lord, rather than some idealistic picture of a past golden age that never really existed.

A subsequent blog will explore some reasons for differences in decline between these denominations.

References

[1]  Data Sources

Church of England
Statistics for Mission 2012, (2014), Archbishops' Council, Research and Statistics, Central Secretariat.:

Church in Wales
Church in Wales Membership and Finances, 2013:
 http://www.lphparish.org.uk/mf_2013.pdf, and previous editions.
The Arthur Rank Centre:
Wales Online:

Scottish Episcopal Church
The Arthur Rank Centre:


Episcopal Church of the USA
The Association of Religious Data Archives: http://www.thearda.com/Denoms/D_849.asp
Episcopal Church of the USA website:

Other UK membership data: Various issues of UK Church Statistics and Religious Trends, Peter Brierley, Brierley Consultancy and Christian Research.

[2] There was too little attendance data to use for the Scottish Episcopal Church.

[3] The limited enthusiasm model was developed to describe the dynamics of revival, see A General Model of Church Growth and Decline, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 29(3), 177-207, 2005.
When modelling decline it is possible to cut the model down and aggregate leaving rates with birth and death rates making model calibration simpler, yet still giving the same results on extinction thresholds.

[4]  See two previous blogs on the Church of England

[5] The limited enthusiasm model does not deal with age categories and assumes constant death rates. In the last few years of a church’s life aging dominates, death rates rise, and decline is faster. However the model’s prediction of the threshold of extinction, and church numbers through most of history, is accurate.

[6] Official attendance data for the Scottish Episcopal church is too limited to draw a clear conclusion on an extinction date, nevertheless a date is provided by its membership figures.


[*] This note added after writing. It always interesting to read what others make of your work. Models need to be critiqued, and become healthy for it. Two external comments worthy of note

Comment 1
I found this comment at http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?p=13201259

"One huge red flag: it makes absolutely no sense to say that the C of E will become extinct in terms of membership 18 years before people stop attending. Much more likely to happen the other way round. That fact alone calls into question whether this "analyst" has any idea what he is talking about"

A great comment. Firstly I computed the extinction data for the C of E with the two sets of data just to show that the extinction date predicted by either was so far in the future that it confirmed the Limited Enthusiasm model's prediction of "margin of extinction". That is, it is too close to call. 10-15 years of data cannot predict dates 50+ years in the future by any method, so their difference is of no significance. All that can be said is if the actions that affect the C of E's decline continue the same way, then extinction this century is unlikely.

Secondly the C of E has been revising its method of measuring attendance by electoral role, making it more realistic, as such it may be artificially declining faster as revision takes effect. Eventually this effect will fade and membership and attendance will be closer.

Thirdly. Membership tends to lag attendance as people take time before they join a church, and there can be a delay before departed members are taken off the role. Thus membership tends to be higher than attendance in declining churches, other way around in growing ones. There can also be age difference, with the membership  in a declining  church having an older profile than attendance. Young people more likely to attend before settling on membership; older people stop attending due to infirmity but remain members. This would give the membership an artificially higher loss rate.

Fourthly when the numbers in the church get low then the type of "deterministic" model used here no longer works to well. Deterministic models give exact numbers at any given time and are reasonably accurate due to averaging. But with small numbers averages get unreliable and modellers prefer "stochastic" models and deal with probabilities. For example the 2039 extinction date for the Church in Wales is an average figure. When numbers get small all you can give are probabilities that it will be 2039, 2042, 2036 etc. There will be a probability it is 2050 - but it will be a very small probability.

I realise the Christian Today review of this blog, on which the comment was based, called me an "analyst". Sounds a bit like an expert in finance trying to gain some legitimacy for their views. I prefer to be called a mathematician - less pretentious! Scientific work should be judged on its own merits not on the description of the author.

Comment 2
Related to this, a comment was made at
http://www.psephizo.com/life-ministry/when-will-the-c-of-e-be-extinct/

"I find the idea that you can extrapolate church attendance figures decades into the future with a simple linear model, well … is this a joke? Even if you wanted to extrapolate decades into the future (which strikes me as way beyond the realms of sanity), the simplest imaginable model would be logarithmic – assuming the church halves in size every N years. A linear model makes no sense at all."

I would completely agree, but ....

Strictly speaking decline through people leaving, and deaths, should be negative exponential, and thus slow the decline down. This is called first order balancing loop in system dynamics. This is exactly what the Limited Enthusiasm Model of church growth predicts, the model I used to decide which side of the extinction threshold each church fell. However the data is NOT negative exponential but linear. The reason, as many of the people who handle church statistics know, is that the church is also aging. The leaving rate and death rates exerts a force that slows the decline, but aging exerts a force that counterbalances it - net result almost linear. Sadly it shows aging, death and leaving have far more effect than retaining children or conversion.

In an ideal world I would build aging into the Limited Enthusiasm model and let that model predict the extinction date rather than the straight line fit. Unfortunately mixing aging, a discrete time process as far as measured ages are concerned, and the social forces of the model, a continuous time process, is a notoriously hard maths problem. It is still an area of research and there was a papers at this year's International System Dynamics Conference on this. Added to that the age profile over time is not that well know.

Sorry the reply is technical, but the issues are technical!



12 comments:

  1. Modernising is responsible for the decline. Folk don't know where they are anymore. Meddling with centuries old Divine services has driven folk away. How can we look to the Church for spiritual support when the modernisers keep spoiling the things we have learnt to trust? A very glaring symptom is that of prayers, particularly at Choral Evensong, where the trend now is for using the Book of Common Worship instead of the Book of Common Prayer and in the worst cases, using prayers made up by the cleric. These invariably turn out to be little more than begging letters sent to a lottery winner... no doubt they get the same treatment as such. There is no need for these adulterations. The Book of Common Prayer has all the prayers AND THANKSGIVINGS needed. The clerics should eschew their vanities and get stick to the 1662 Book of Common Prayer and revert to the readings from the King James Bible. Dumb us up not down please.

    RR

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can fully understand your point. The Book of Common Prayer (BCP) was designed, as I understand it, to put doctrinal substance to worship, free of the ability and beliefs of the clergyman, and the same everywhere. Of course it was radical, like the King James Bible, in that it used the language of the people. I suspect the BCP helped protect the Anglican church from the theological drift seen in the free churches. Now in the spirit of the Cranmer there is a case for modernisation the language. But as far as I can see every revision of the BCP has also changed doctrinal elements. I have never been clear of the justification for this. If something was true in 1549, or 1662, then presumably it is still true now. And if it was contrary to scripture then it remains so now. In recent times the Anglican church has lost its sense of its own history, like the free churches. And I am afraid like them, such lack of regard for the contribution of the saints of the past may well hasten its decline. Churches, and religion, are at their strongest when their beliefs transcend the present and are fixed on things unmovable. Thank you for your comment.

      Delete
    2. Speaking of "The church might find the future easier to face by keeping in mind its mission, and its Lord, rather than some idealistic picture of a past golden age that never really existed."

      Delete
  2. I wonder if the goalposts keep getting moved in the compilation of these statistics. Have the historic numbers been altered to reflect the modern approach of counting not just Sunday attendance etc. Honesty is not always the case for churchmen (and women). And why so many more bishops perhaps you could provide some average numbers per bishop?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is not a huge amount of historical attendance data, for most denominations. Christian Research did four surveys from 1979, they were independent of denominational figures though not measured the same way. Historic membership data has been in the public domain so not readily open for alteration. I suspects the methods of estimating membership has changed for some churches. The Anglican church does not really have membership, electoral role is an unreliable as it depends on the current policy. The C of E has tightened this up, hence part of the fall, but I am sure most of the fall is genuine loss. There is an honesty element, but even more so there is just poor and lazy estimation. When institutions face decline, or other pressures such as NHS, universities etc, there is tendency to keep reorganising and create more "managerial" and "support" positions which they claim means they can have less of the font-end staff, ministers, doctors, lecturers. It tends t move these organisations further from their core purpose, and as far as I can see leads to more pressure, and in the case of churches, further decline. We shall see.

      Delete
  3. ECUSA is not helped by its lust for litigation and division as the events described below indicate:-
    n 2004, the congregation of St James, Newport Beach, California, voted to secede from the Episcopal Church thus launching a nine year law suit with the Episcopal Diocese of LA. In 2013 the diocese eventually prevailed in the California Supreme Court. The court was not influenced by a letter written by the bishop at that time assuring the congregation that the property could be held in the name of this corporation independent of the diocese. This was requested since funds donated by local parishioners would be used to acquire a nearby bank for its parking spaces and to completely rebuild the church in order to house 300 congregants. The property was apparently then held in the name of a corporation sole controlled by Bishop Bruno.
    Following his victory in 2013, Bishop Bruno appointed Canon Cindy Vorhees as vicar urging all to listen to and follow her vision in order to create a dynamic Episcopal church addressing the challenges of the 21st century. It is common knowledge that since the 1970’s The Episcopal Church has been in relentless decline. St James, now the St James the Great, opened on October 1st 2013 and by June 7, 2015, Cindy Vorhees‘ leadership has surpassed all expectations. Weekly attendance exceeded and still exceeds that of two other Episcopalian churches in the area. Indeed it was on the brink of fully implementing the bishop’s and vicar’s vision as a self sufficient spiritual home to 100-135 Christians each Sunday. On May 17th 2015, Bishop Bruno visited the church to inform the vicar and the astonished congregation that the property would be sold for commercial development at the earliest in October, 2015, the price being $15M. To soften the blow, he assured those present that he would insist on a ‘lease back’ to give the vicar and the congregation time to make arrangements to pray elsewhere. One week later he revised this stating that the property would go into escrow to close by the end of June and there would be no leaseback.
    On June 28th attendance at St James the Great 10am Eucharist numbered 225 people. June 29th 2015 the Monday evening chant group arrived at 7pm only to be informed that from that time, the vicar, the staff and the entire congregation would be locked out. Next Sunday, 170 people attended holy communion on the park outside where they continue to pray each Sunday. However, it appeared that the family that donated the land had written into the deed a restriction stating that if the land stopped being used for religious purposes title would revert to them. The Bishop then proceeded to sue the donors for slander of title.
    The congregation filed presentments at the Presiding Bishop’s office alleging over 150 violations of canon law. A panel of bishops has been appointed and comprises Presiding Bishop, Most Reverend Katherine Jefferts Schori, Bishop Mathews, Head of Office for Pastoral Development and the Right Rev Catharine Waynick, Head of the Disciplinary Board. This panel is investigating these alleged violations while the civil courts are considering the deed restriction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When I wrote these blogs on Anglican decline I realised I was treading in areas where there has been much conflict and hurt and that strong emotions could be raised. There would be something wrong with us if such church issues did not raise our emotions, we are not just dealing with temporal issues, but eternal ones for which we will all be answerable to God. So I fully understand your post and empathise with you and all involved in the experiences you describe.

      Because you refer to other people and events outside my knowledge I can't comment on the details you give. However I am happy to leave your experiences up on my blog so that others can see the effects church policies and divisions have on individuals. Hopefully anyone reading, even if they disagree with you, will respect your viewpoint.

      Much of church history is littered with such conflicts. It is utterly amazing how the Lord Jesus still manages to grow his church, save people and bring glory to his name despite all our efforts to mess it up.

      Thank you, and God bless

      John

      Delete
    2. When I wrote these blogs on Anglican decline I realised I was treading in areas where there has been much conflict and hurt and that strong emotions could be raised. There would be something wrong with us if such church issues did not raise our emotions, we are not just dealing with temporal issues, but eternal ones for which we will all be answerable to God. So I fully understand your post and empathise with you and all involved in the experiences you describe.

      Because you refer to other people and events outside my knowledge I can't comment on the details you give. However I am happy to leave your experiences up on my blog so that others can see the effects church policies and divisions have on individuals. Hopefully anyone reading, even if they disagree with you, will respect your viewpoint.

      Much of church history is littered with such conflicts. It is utterly amazing how the Lord Jesus still manages to grow his church, save people and bring glory to his name despite all our efforts to mess it up.

      Thank you, and God bless

      John

      Delete
  4. As a former Episcopalian who grew up in the church and left recently, I predict ECUSA is going to be in major trouble in about 10 years or even less. The people who are currently keeping that "church" afloat are elderly parishioners in their 80s who grew up in ECUSA and are loyal to the church despite not being totally comfortable with the doctrinal changes. Some of them are foolishly hoping for "reconciliation" with the conservative congregations who have left. It's never going to happen.

    Once the 80somethings die off within the next 10 years, ECUSA is going to be without some of its more stable and financially supportive members. Perhaps some endowments will be left, but that won't help some churches, which will close entirely.

    Case in point: One of the last Episcopal churches I went to was almost entirely elderly - they had no children or families and were desperate to get some. The orthodox Anglican (ACNA) church I go to now is small but filled with young families with babies and small kids.

    I expect to hear within 15 years or less that ECUSA has joined forces with similarly dying leftist Lutheran denomination ECLA. (The orthodox Lutherans have already left as well). Same thing with the leftist Presbyterians.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, sure. You people were predicting that 25 years ago, too

      Delete
    2. Well ... people have been predicting decline since the 1950s. Look at the graph of the UK Methodist church in
      http://churchgrowthmodelling.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/institutionalism-and-church-decline.html
      and you will see they were correct. Similar graphs can be produced for the historic US churches, it is just the decline started later. But on a year by year basis people don't notice because the decline is slow and at any given time only a fraction of congregations are like the ones in the post you replied to. They then close and another set of congregations become small and elderly.

      When denominations get too small they do merge, so do congregations, there are examples in the UK in the last 40 years. There have been similar mergers in the USA. The United Church of Christ came about by a series of mergers of congregational and reformed congregations. Likewise there are splits. Lutheran have had both. So its not surprising the same is happening with the Anglican. What is sad is that so many get hurt in the process. It would be better if churches could agree to separate amicably when there are unresolvable differences.

      Delete
  5. Just posted this on http://www.psephizo.com/life-ministry/when-will-the-c-of-e-be-extinct, in response to Comment 2 at the end of the post - pasting below for reference...

    "John - thank you for your reply. My reaction was based on the referenced blog post alone, and you clearly have some very sophisticated models elsewhere. I'm puzzled as to why you didn't use your models in this case, and resorted to such a simplistic model."

    ReplyDelete